Hawaii County prosecutors are very aggressive when it comes to DUI charges because this offense is much more common in Hawaii than it is on the mainland. The self-reported driving while the intoxicated rate is about 50 percent higher here than in the Lower 48. Statistically, the fatality rate is also higher in the Rainbow State than it is elsewhere.
DUI has significant direct and indirect consequences. In addition to fines, court supervision, and jail time, most defendants must deal with drivers’ license suspension and much higher auto insurance rates.
To counter aggressive prosecutors, Kamuela DUI lawyers take an equally aggressive stance. Typically, that stance includes one or more of the three defensive strategies outlined below. Many times, these defenses at least enable a Kamuela DUI lawyer to negotiate a favorable plea agreement.
Procedural Hurdles in DUI Cases
Many Hawaii County prosecutors, especially if they are not very experienced, do not appreciate the complexities of Section 291E-61. These lawyers often think that all DUIs are the same. But under the statute, there are four distinct ways to prove intoxication:
- Influence of alcohol “sufficient to impair the person’s normal mental faculties or ability to care for the person and guard against casualty,”
- Influence of a non-alcohol drug “under the influence of any drug that impairs the person’s ability to operate the vehicle in a careful and prudent manner,”
- A breath alcohol level above .08, or
- A blood alcohol level above .08.
Hawaii’s DUI law does not include a phrase like “or a combination of one or more of these things.” Prosecutors must establish one of the four different kinds of intoxication.
The type of Breathalyzer illustrates one of these pitfalls. Some of these gadgets measure breath alcohol and produce a blood alcohol estimate. Others measure and display only breath alcohol. So, if the state pleads the fourth type of impairment but the evidence shows a breath alcohol level, a judge may throw the case out of court due to the variance between the pleadings and proof.
Generally, a Hawaii County judge will allow prosecutors to dismiss and refile charges in these situations. But at that point, many prosecutors would rather negotiate a favorable plea deal than start over at the beginning.
Not Driving Can Still Mean DUI
Many people are surprised to learn that driving is not an element of driving under the influence in Hawaii. Instead, the statute only requires the defendant to “operate or assume actual physical control of a vehicle.”
So, people who operate driverless cars could be guilty of DUI. That’s especially true in the currently available cars which are not completely autonomous.
Additionally, people who are asleep or passed out behind the wheel could be guilty of DUI. If they had the keys and the vehicle was drivable, they were probably in physical control of the vehicle. However, if they did not have the keys and/or the car was out of gas or otherwise not drivable, a Kamuela DUI lawyer might be able to get the charges thrown out of court.
DUI-collision cases raise a similar point. The prosecutor must prove each element of the offense, including operating the vehicle, beyond any reasonable doubt. Usually, by the time police officers arrive at a collision scene, the driver has either voluntarily exited the vehicle or been transported to a hospital. Unless a witness can “wheel” the defendant (place the defendant behind the wheel at or very near the time of the crash), DUI charges may not hold up in court.
“Not Intoxicated” as Defense for DUI
In many DUI cases, intoxication, or lack thereof, is the only real issue. Generally, prosecutors may use either direct or circumstantial evidence to establish intoxication. Kamuela DUI lawyers often successfully challenge both kinds of evidence.
- Chemical Test Results: Breathalyzers are not 100 percent accurate. For example, these gadgets often read acetone, which the body produces naturally, like ethanol. Some people, including smokers and diabetics, have naturally high acetone levels. As for blood tests, a Kamuela DUI lawyer can order a re-test. These independent tests often produce different results than the ones police laboratory technicians claim they find.
- Field Sobriety Tests: The horizontal gaze nystagmus (DUI eye test), walk-and-turn, and one-leg stand are almost entirely subjective. The officers’ interpretation may be much different from the jury’s interpretation, and the jury’s opinion is the only one that counts. Additionally, prosecutors must prove that the defendant failed the FSTs because s/he was intoxicated, and not because s/he was nervous, sleepy, or clumsy.
The burden of proof in criminal cases (beyond a reasonable doubt) is the highest-burden in U.S. law. So, many people are not legally guilty simply because there was not enough evidence to convict them.
Connect with an Assertive Kamuela Attorney
There is a big difference between a drunk driving arrest and a drunk driving conviction. For a confidential consultation with an experienced Kamuela DUI lawyer, contact Olson & Son, L.C. Convenient payment plans are available.